A+ BBB Accredited
★★★★★ 4.9/5 from 1,200+ reviews
HUD-Approved · NMLS #13999
Explore All Reverse×
Programs
How It Works
Calculators
Resources
Why All Reverse
HUD-approved direct lender · NMLS #13999
4.9/5 from 1,200+ reviews
ARLO

See What Your Home Could Do for You

Your instant quote includes eligibility, real-time rates
Michael G. Branson Michael G. Branson, CEO of All Reverse Mortgage, Inc., and moderator of ARLO™, has 45 years of experience in mortgage banking, with the past 20 years devoted exclusively to reverse mortgages. A Forbes Real Estate Council member, he developed the industry's first fixed-rate jumbo reverse mortgage and has been featured in Forbes, Kiplinger, the LA Times, and Yahoo Finance. (License: NMLS# 14040)
Cliff Auerswald Cliff Auerswald, President of All Reverse Mortgage, Inc., and co-creator of ARLO™ — the industry's first real-time reverse mortgage pricing engine — has 27 years of experience in mortgage banking, with 20+ years focused exclusively on reverse mortgages. A recognized expert in reverse mortgage technology and consumer education, he has been featured in Kiplinger, Yahoo Finance, Realtor.com, and HousingWire. (License: NMLS# 14041)

Can I Opt for a Voluntary Life Expectancy Set-Aside? (LESA)

Michael G. Branson, CEO of All Reverse Mortgage
CEO · 45 yrs in mortgage banking
Cliff Auerswald, President of All Reverse Mortgage
President · All Reverse Mortgage Inc.
4 min read Fact Checked HUD-Lender #26031-0007 2 comments

Just learned of this feature, LESA. Am a current Reverse Mortgage holder and received a solicitation from a mortgage co. There is a lot to absorb regarding RM’s and unless you are an educated real estate professional, it is virtually impossible to understand all the ramifications of these deals. Even with the “counseling” as required, total understanding remains murky. I would have many questions about refinancing, but my main question would be: Unless you need a LESA why would you consider one? Aren’t you better off without one unless you do need it. I believe the confusion and even bad reputations of RM’s is due to the complexity of all the regulations, economics of the loans, government involvement, but, probably, most of all is the inability of people to manage their money in any sort of reasonable and or sane manner. For way too many people all the money in the world would never be enough. Meaning that people will spend every nickel they get their hands on as fast as they can, without ever grasping the principles of savings and providing for future expenditures. I can live quite well on my meager SS and am glad they have the reverse mortgage program available. Even though I have refinanced once, I have the nagging feeling that we did not gain that much, and the processing is horrendous now. So, the question remains:

“Aren’t you better off NOT getting a LESA unless you are absolutely unable to manage your finances?”


Can I Opt for a Voluntary Life Expectancy Set-Aside? (LESA)

Let me make sure I understand the basis of your question.  Because the vast majority of all borrowers who receive a Life Expectancy Set Aside (LESA) do so as a result of a mandatory reason as determined by HUD financial assessment rules (either due to past credit issues, insufficient income to fully meet the HUD residual income requirements, etc), I can only assume you are referring to borrowers who elect to take the LESA to pay their taxes and insurance but are not required to in order to receive the loan?  This is an extremely small percentage of the borrowers who actually wind up receiving the LESA and for them, the decision is based on their own personal circumstances.


For example, I have a borrower for whom I closed a loan within the past year whose only reason for doing a reverse mortgage is that she can no longer afford the taxes on her home but can’t bear the thought of moving.  She has a ton of equity in the house, has no heirs and cannot qualify for another loan (HELOC) to help her make the tax payments as they come due and would not want the payments on the HELOC even if she could find a lender to give her the loan.  She elected to take the LESA so that the taxes and insurance on her home are now paid for her and the funds are not considered borrowed until the lender actually makes the payment on her behalf.


She told me that she is comforted by the fact that she has a line of credit available to her if she ever needs it for home repairs, etc. for which she cannot pay otherwise.  But what really allows here to sleep at night now is that she doesn’t even have to worry about the payment of her taxes anymore or scrimp and save each month to make sure she has the money to pay those taxes in the 4 installments that she had been struggling to meet.  She says she doesn’t think she will even need the line of credit for other withdrawals because she thinks she will be able to meet all other home needs absent the quarterly tax assessments that have been draining her cash resources.  She loves her home and does not want to move but was afraid she would have to because the taxes have just gotten so high (and she is right, they are pretty high!).


So in this borrower’s case, the voluntary LESA works extremely well.  But as I started with saying, most borrowers don’t choose the voluntary LESA, preferring to have the funds available to them instead.  It just depends on your own unique circumstances.  Like the loan itself, there is not one answer that applies to all borrowers and our job here is to provide folks with the answers so that they can make the best decisions to meet their individual needs.


ARLO recommends these helpful resources: 


ARLO Testimonials
America's #1 Rated Reverse Lender Celebrating 20 Years of Excellence.
Author Michael Branson
About the Author, Michael G. Branson | Mike@allreverse.com
Michael G. Branson CEO, All Reverse Mortgage, Inc. and moderator of ARLO™ has 45 years of experience in the mortgage banking industry. He has devoted the past 20 years to reverse mortgages exclusively.

Have a Question About Reverse Mortgages?

Look no further. Michael G. Branson, our CEO, brings a wealth of knowledge directly to you. With a robust 45-year tenure in mortgage banking and 20 years dedicated solely to reverse mortgages, he's the expert you want on your side.
Post your question in the comments below and anticipate a personalized response from Mr. Branson himself, typically within one business day. He's here to illuminate all angles of reverse mortgages, ensuring you're equipped with the knowledge to make informed decisions. Take this opportunity to gain insights from a seasoned professional.

Over 2000 of your questions answered by ARLO™
Ask your question now!

2 Comments on this Article
  1.   Joseph Bowman
    February 18th, 2017
    My sister-in-law took out a reverse mortgage for $400,000.00 to be paid in two payments of 1/2 each year. She passed away before the second year payment was received. The payments were to go into her checking account. Does the second payment still go into the checking account as she had set up? If so, does the home now go the lender? She has a sister who is POD on her checking account. What if any is her responsibility to deal with the lender? Thank you
    Reply to Joseph
    • Michael Branson Michael Branson
      February 22nd, 2017
      Hi Joseph,
       
      Firstly, the two draws available to the borrower are not automatic.  She would have to request the second tier of funds available and those funds would not be released after her passing.  However, since she never borrowed the funds, they are not due now that it is time to think about paying the loan back.
       
      The home does not go to the lender, it goes to her heirs.  She would be the one who decided who would receive the property upon her passing and if she died with no will, it would be up to the court to determine.  The lender has a mortgage loan that is now due and payable, so whoever is to inherit the property would want to determine what their plans for it are.  Do they want to sell it and keep the proceeds, do they want to refinance the loan and live in the property, or they can walk away if they choose but then the lender would have to foreclose and take the property to protect their interest.  If the loan was just closed, there is a lot of equity in the property and it would certainly be in the heir's best interest to decide which route they want to take and begin making plans accordingly. 
       
      The checking account is not in any way a factor for the reverse mortgage lender.  They can only look to the property to repay the loan.  However, as I stated, if she never even got the second tier payout on the loan, there is bound to be a lot of equity that whoever inherits the property should seek to protect as well by determining what they want to do - sell the home or refinance the loan and keep it.
      Reply to Michael

Leave a Reply to This Article